Eugen Soloviov

Eugen Soloviov

Trading-systems engineer

Trading-systems engineer building bots since 2017: cross-exchange arbitrage (connected up to 30 venues), cointegration-based pairs arbitrage across spot and futures, scalping, news and sentiment-driven strategies, trend algorithms, and portfolio management and balancing algorithms. Also builds sub-millisecond order execution, big-data warehouses, backtesting engines, AI agents, and trading interfaces (incl. open-source profitmaker.cc). Stack: JS/TS, Python, Rust/Zig/Go, DevOps, backend, frontend, architecture.

Articles

The Other Way a Regression Lies: Endogeneity, 2SLS, and the Gamma Calibration Problem

The Other Way a Regression Lies: Endogeneity, 2SLS, and the Gamma Calibration Problem

Selection bias in the search is not the only way a regression fools you. When the regressor is correlated with the error, more data makes the estimate more confidently wrong. Instrumental variables applied to the one endogeneity problem this blog has already left open: permanent impact from net taker flow.

Hawkes Processes for Order Arrival and Market Event Modeling

Hawkes Processes for Order Arrival and Market Event Modeling

Fitting a self-exciting point process to real crypto trade tape: where the three numbers (mu, alpha, beta) come from, how to estimate the branching ratio n, whether the exponential kernel survives a goodness-of-fit test, and how much n moves when you change the estimation window.

Hamiltonian Neural Networks: Does a Financial System Conserve Anything?

Hamiltonian Neural Networks: Does a Financial System Conserve Anything?

Hamiltonian Neural Networks are provably stable — but stability is worthless if the conserved quantity does not exist. Learning a scalar H via autograd, symplectic integration, and the falsification test that decides whether a financial (q, p) pair is canonical at all.

Toda-Yamamoto vs Differenced Granger: Does the BTC Lead-Lag Survive?

Toda-Yamamoto vs Differenced Granger: Does the BTC Lead-Lag Survive?

Granger causality on crypto prices done two ways — differenced returns and Toda-Yamamoto on levels — with a correct Wald implementation, an effective-N corrected causality matrix, and a rolling-stability test of whether the lag is tradeable at all.

Parametrik bo'lmagan narxlarni modellashtirish uchun Gauss jarayonlari

Parametrik bo'lmagan narxlarni modellashtirish uchun Gauss jarayonlari

Moliyaviy vaqt seriyalari uchun yadro dizayni - onaning pürüzlülüğü, mahalliy davriy tarkibi, spektral aralashmalar - va hech qanday tekshirish to'plamiga muhtoj bo'lmagan tartibga soluvchi sifatida chekli ehtimollik. Bundan tashqari, biron bir sotilishidan oldin o'lchanishi kerak bo'lgan narsalarning halol ro'yxati.

PDE-ga asoslangan moliyaviy modellashtirish uchun Furye neyron operatori

PDE-ga asoslangan moliyaviy modellashtirish uchun Furye neyron operatori

Operatorni o'rganish nuqtalarni emas, balki butun funktsiya bo'shliqlarini xaritalaydi - Furye Neyron Operatori chastotalar bo'shlig'ida PDE yechim operatorini qanday parametrlashtirgani, opsion narxlari uchun nimani sotib olishi va uning da'volaridan qaysi biri hali ham haqiqiy uskunada o'lchashga muhtoj.

To'liq kunlik kontekst o'n daqiqani uradimi? Diqqat va ketma-ketlik bo'yicha savol

To'liq kunlik kontekst o'n daqiqani uradimi? Diqqat va ketma-ketlik bo'yicha savol

Flash Attention 23 400 bosqichli savdo kontekstini hisoblash uchun bepul qiladi — plitka qo‘yish, onlayn softmax va IO chegarasi N^2 d^2/M. Bu uzoqroq kontekst modelni yaxshiroq qiladimi yoki yo‘qmi, bu alohida savol va uni tasdiqlash emas, o‘lchash kerak.

Ansambl usullari: mustahkam alfa uchun zaif o'quvchilarni birlashtirish

Ansambl usullari: mustahkam alfa uchun zaif o'quvchilarni birlashtirish

Savdo ansambllari haqida uchta narsa bu blogda yoritilmagan: nega modellar soni emas, kovariatsiya atamasi ansambl xatosida ustunlik qiladi, stacking oʻta meta-xususiyatlarga ega boʻlgan signal-kombinatsiya qatlami sifatida qanday ishlaydi va koʻplab signallar boʻylab aylanma tarmogʻi amalda bajarish narxini pasaytiradimi yoki yoʻqmi.

Double Machine Learning: Returninglarni Bashorat Qilish O'rniga Sababiy Parametrni Baholash

Double Machine Learning: Returninglarni Bashorat Qilish O'rniga Sababiy Parametrni Baholash

Bu blogdagi barcha modellar hozirgacha 'nimani nimani bashorat qiladi?' savolini javob beradi. Double ML 'nimaga nima sabab bo'ladi?' savolini javob beradi — himoya qila oladigan standart xato bilan. Qisman chiziqli model, Neyman ortogonaliteti, order book ma'lumotlarida tozalandirilgan cross-fitting va haqiqiy DML ishonch oralig'i faqat bitta oldindan belgilangan savolga nisbatan omon qolishiga oid sharhli hisobot.

Savdo-sotiqda Heterogen Davolash Ta'sirlari uchun Kausal O'rmonlar

Savdo-sotiqda Heterogen Davolash Ta'sirlari uchun Kausal O'rmonlar

Ushbu blogdagi har bir backtest shartli o'rtacha qiymatni baholaydi. Kausal o'rmonlar buning o'rniga shartli davolash effektini baholaydi — tau(x) o'rniga mu(x) — vijdlan bo'linish, moslashuvchan yadro og'irliklari va topgan heterogennilik haqiqiymi yoki yo'qmi aytadigan kalibrlash testi bilan.

Epistemik va Aleatorik: Qaytarish Modelining Bilmedagini O'chash

Epistemik va Aleatorik: Qaytarish Modelining Bilmedagini O'chash

Ushbu blogdagi har bir pozitsiya o'lcham qoida noaniqlikni bitta skalerga qisqartiradi. MC Dropout va chuqur ansambllar uni modelning bilmasligi va bozor shovqini sifatida ajratadi — va bu ikki turi turli pozitsiya o'lchamlarini nazarda tutadi.

Tizimli savdo quvurlari uchun AutoML

Tizimli savdo quvurlari uchun AutoML

Avtomatlashtirilgan funksiyalarni yaratish (tsfresh, Featuretools), byudjetdan xabardor modellarni qidirish (FLAMLning tejamkor optimizatori) va WorldQuant formulali alfa zavodi — tadqiqot yoʻnalishining qismlari ushbu blogning qidiruv va haddan tashqari moslama yoyi hech qachon qamrab olinmagan va arcning oʻz natijalari ular haqida nima deydi.