← All Collections
🧬 15 parts

Modern ML for Trading

The full gradient-boosting-to-neural-operator toolkit — ensembles, AutoML, probabilistic forecasting, distillation and pruning for latency, plus physics-informed architectures like Neural ODEs and Fourier operators.

  1. 01
    用於報酬方向的 XGBoost:類別不平衡與決策閾值
    Aug 25, 2026 #machine-learning

    用於報酬方向的 XGBoost:類別不平衡與決策閾值

    報酬方向分類器是不平衡問題,而 0.5 是錯誤的決策閾值。比較加密貨幣資料上的 scale_pos_weight、焦點損失與精確率約束閾值最佳化,以及 XGBoost、LightGBM 和 CatBoost 之間的工程差異。

  2. 02
    整合方法:結合弱學習者以獲得穩健的 Alpha
    Aug 3, 2026 #machine-learning

    整合方法:結合弱學習者以獲得穩健的 Alpha

    本部落格未涵蓋有關交易整合的三件事:為什麼協方差項(而不是模型計數)在整合誤差中占主導地位,堆疊如何作為具有折疊元特徵的訊號組合層工作,以及跨多個訊號的周轉淨額是否真正降低了執行成本。

  3. 03
    用於系統化交易流程的 AutoML
    Jul 30, 2026 #AutoML

    用於系統化交易流程的 AutoML

    自動特徵生成(tsfresh、Featuretools)、具預算感知的模型搜尋(FLAML 的節省成本最佳化器),以及 WorldQuant 公式化 alpha 工廠——本部落格搜尋與過度擬合系列尚未涵蓋的研究流程部分,以及該系列自身結果對它們的啟示。

  4. 04
    Multi-Task Learning for Simultaneous Price, Volume, and Volatility Prediction
    Aug 15, 2026 #deep-learning

    Multi-Task Learning for Simultaneous Price, Volume, and Volatility Prediction

    Does jointly predicting return, volume, and volatility actually help? Measuring loss-balancing schemes and diagnosing negative transfer through gradient cosine similarity — with a classical baseline and purged walk-forward folds.

  5. 05
    交易機器人保護中的異常檢測:從Z-Score到Transformer
    Feb 19, 2026 #演算法交易

    交易機器人保護中的異常檢測:從Z-Score到Transformer

    哪些異常檢測方法在加密貨幣演算法交易中真正有效,如何構建級聯防護架構,以及為何這是演算法交易不可或缺的基礎。

  6. 06
    Scoring Probabilistic Forecasts: CRPS, PIT Calibration, and DeepAR
    Aug 20, 2026 #forecasting

    Scoring Probabilistic Forecasts: CRPS, PIT Calibration, and DeepAR

    How to evaluate a predictive distribution honestly — CRPS as a proper scoring rule, the PIT histogram as a calibration diagnostic, and DeepAR sampling in GluonTS.

  7. 07
    逐筆資料模型中的不規則時間:連續時間編碼與純位置嵌入
    Aug 22, 2026 #HFT

    逐筆資料模型中的不規則時間:連續時間編碼與純位置嵌入

    餵入逐筆資料的序列模型仍假設間隔規則。本文介紹三種告訴 Transformer 某筆成交實際發生時間的方法——可學習時間尺度的連續編碼、ODE-RNN 潛在狀態,以及把 delta_t 作為一般特徵——並以消融實驗決定它們之間的取捨。

  8. 08
    一整天的內容能勝過十分鐘的內容嗎? Flash 注意力與序列長度問題
    Aug 4, 2026 #deep-learning

    一整天的內容能勝過十分鐘的內容嗎? Flash 注意力與序列長度問題

    Flash Attention 讓 23,400 步驟的交易上下文無需計算——平鋪、線上 softmax 和 N^2 d^2 / M 的 IO 界限。更長的上下文是否使模型更好是一個單獨的問題,它必須被測量,而不是斷言。

  9. 09
    Knowledge Distillation: Compressing Trading Models for Low-Latency Deployment
    Aug 11, 2026 #model-compression

    Knowledge Distillation: Compressing Trading Models for Low-Latency Deployment

    The blog's standing answer to the accuracy-vs-latency tension is a two-stage fast/slow split. Distillation is a different answer: train one small model to mimic the ensemble. The KD loss, temperature, born-again nets, early exits for a variable latency budget, and the distill-to-FPGA pipeline — plus the measurements that would decide whether it beats the two-stage split.

  10. 10
    Model Pruning for Low-Latency Trading Inference
    Aug 14, 2026 #model-compression

    Model Pruning for Low-Latency Trading Inference

    Magnitude and structured pruning, the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis, movement pruning, distillation and 2:4 sparsity — the methods behind shrinking a trading model, and what still has to be measured before any of it ships.

  11. 11
    非參數價格建模的高斯過程
    Aug 6, 2026 #bayesian

    非參數價格建模的高斯過程

    金融時間序列的核設計——母體粗糙度、局部週期成分、光譜混合——以及作為不需要驗證集的正則化器的邊際似然。加上在任何東西可以交易之前仍然需要衡量的誠實清單。

  12. 12
    認識與對立:衡量收益模型不知道的東西
    Jul 31, 2026 #bayesian

    認識與對立:衡量收益模型不知道的東西

    本博客的每個位置 sizing 規則都把不確定性坍縮成單一純量。MC Dropout 和深度集成將其拆分為模型無知與市場噪聲——這兩者值得不同的 position size。

  13. 13
    Neural ODEs: Does Continuous Time Beat a Delta-Time Feature?
    Aug 16, 2026 #deep-learning

    Neural ODEs: Does Continuous Time Beat a Delta-Time Feature?

    Neural ODEs, Neural SDEs and continuous normalizing flows for irregularly-sampled market data — and the one ablation that decides whether continuous dynamics are worth their solver cost.

  14. 14
    Hamiltonian Neural Networks: Does a Financial System Conserve Anything?
    Aug 8, 2026 #deep-learning

    Hamiltonian Neural Networks: Does a Financial System Conserve Anything?

    Hamiltonian Neural Networks are provably stable — but stability is worthless if the conserved quantity does not exist. Learning a scalar H via autograd, symplectic integration, and the falsification test that decides whether a financial (q, p) pair is canonical at all.

  15. 15
    基於偏微分方程的金融建模的傅立葉神經算子
    Aug 5, 2026 #deep-learning

    基於偏微分方程的金融建模的傅立葉神經算子

    算子學習映射整個函數空間,而不是點——傅立葉神經算子如何在頻率空間中參數化 PDE 解算子,為選擇權定價購買什麼,以及它的哪些主張仍然需要在真實硬體上測量。